The bizarre and twisted story of Web.com Tour pro Rhein Gibson’s 72nd-hole penalty took another turn late this week as the rules official who assessed the one-shot penalty that ultimately cost Gibson $12,000 spoke about the issue.
Jim Duncan is the vice president of role, competitions and administration for the Web.com Tour and happened to be the official who made the call under 18-2. When Brandon Davis, Gibson’s caddie in the Bahamas Great Abaco Classic, picked up his player’s ball it violated the rule in Duncan’s view, which led to Gibson throwing his putter cover at Davis.
— Benny DTD (@BennyDTD) January 24, 2018
Davis disputed the penalty, but ultimately it remained. GolfChannel.com’s Will Gray had Duncan’s version of the event and reasoning for assessing the penalty.
Duncan was the on-site rules official who made the ruling in question. He shared his recollection of the incident in a phone interview, one that conflicted with how Davis portrayed the situation.
“Contrary to what Brandon said, I did not find the ball,” Duncan said. “(Gibson) was kind of looking in the high grass or whatever, and I turned around and said to Rhein that we had found the ball. And the caddie had actually sort of gotten behind me, and Rhein’s now walking toward me, and I turn around and that’s when (Davis) picked the ball up.
“And before I can even say a word, now Rhein goes, ‘Well, I guess I can’t play it now.'”
The penalty was administered under Rule 18-2, which notes that one shot will be added if a caddie moves a ball while at rest without a player’s authority. Decision 26-1/9 specifically addresses a caddie picking up a ball in a hazard, and Davis believed that it should have negated any potential penalty if there was “no doubt or it was reasonable to assume” the player would not have tried to hit his ball from the hazard.
But the decision also stipulates that any doubt must be resolved “against the player,” meaning the penalty must stand in such instances. In Duncan’s view, the comment Gibson made about not having an opportunity to evaluate the ball for a potential shot meant the penalty should stand.
“I know when I see guys that I’d say are veteran caddies in a search like this, I can picture a few people and they’ve got the bag down and they let the player decide everything,” Duncan said. “Touching a player’s ball, or doing acts that that the player normally does in the foundation of golf, there’s a lot of things that can actually get the player in trouble that the caddie does.”
Duncan noted that Decision 26-1/9 offers officials “a little wiggle room” in certain situations, but in this particular case he believes that the added stroke was the appropriate outcome.
“You’re kind of trying to keep the onus on the player to decide what he’s going to do,” Duncan said, “and not really let the caddie get involved with that part of the game.”
Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest goings-on in the world of golf by following the SwingxSwing Clubhouse on social media. We share stories, stats and breaking news on Twitter, keep the fun going off the course on Instagram and share any and all golf-related topics on Facebook.
Never be the odd golfer out when your friends are talking about the latest or funniest happenings in golf. Sign up for the SxS newsletter today!